Abstract 
    
      There are about 150 countries and regions with QF development and  implementation, including the HKQF, the national QFs in EU member states and the  transnational European QF. All QFs have some common essential aims, such as to  support lifelong learning, to promote learning progression and mobility, to  facilitate qualification recognition, and ultimately to enhance the  competitiveness of the workforce. 
         
        The HKQF, launched since 2008 by the Education Bureau (EDB) of the HKSAR  Government, has been developing as a local framework encompassing  qualifications in different sectors of education and training in Hong Kong. The  progress of developing the HKQF is encouraging in that it helps industries to  define competency standards, assure the quality of education and training  provided, and facilitate the progression of learners in Hong Kong. Based on the  maturity of the HKQF and the similar principles underpinned the HKQF and the  EQF (including, inter alia, the use of learning outcomes and the international  QA principles), the European Commission (EC) and the EDB jointly conducted a  comparability study in 2014, with the aim of fostering mutual understanding and  recognition of the quality and standards of education and training systems in  the two regions. The study was completed in March 2016, and the report was  finalized and accepted by both the EDB and the EC.  
         
        In the report, the use of learning outcomes in the HKQF and the EQF is  fully explained. In the HK section, full explanations are provided on the  outcomes-based teaching and learning (OBTL), the outcomes basis of the HKQF,  the outcomes-based approach of accreditation and the use of learning outcomes  in higher education, vocational and professional education, and continuing  education. Also in the report, it explains the robustness of the QA system in  Hong Kong which has aspired international confidence. The three QA bodies in  Hong Kong, which provide oversight of different providers and programmes, also  base their QA procedures on well-defined and internationally accepted QA  principles.  
         
        The study result is expected to be of use to policy makers and  beneficial to stakeholders and organisations in different sectors. Institutions  and providers will find the level-to-level comparison useful for implementing  exchange programmes with credit recognition. Multinational companies operating  in Hong Kong will find that the comparison provides strong reference on  standards of qualifications when recruiting talent from overseas. The study  further supports Hong Kong in being an education hub. The findings of the study  also enable local and international enterprises to make business decisions,  particularly if decisions are dependent on availability and contribution of  personnel with suitable qualifications. Likewise, it is hoped that the  government, education institutions and companies in Macao can also benefit from  the findings of the report. 
       | 
  
  
    Author Profile(s) 
      
      Ms Florence TSANG, Assistant Secretary,  Further Education Division, Education Bureau, Hong Kong. Miss Florence Tsang  has been Assistant Secretary (Further Education) of the Hong Kong SAR Education  Bureau since November 2014.  Before  joining the Education Bureau, she has served in the Labour and Welfare Bureau  and the Development Bureau.  She was one  of the officers in the Education Bureau overseeing the Comparability Study of  the Hong Kong Qualifications Framework and the European Qualifications  Framework. 
       
      
      Dr Yee Wah CHENG completed her undergraduate study in Hong Kong, and postgraduate  studies in Canada. Upon graduation, she worked in the universities in Canada  and Hong Kong till 2005. In 2006, she joined the then Education and Manpower  Bureau of the HKSAR Government for the development of the HKQF. She has then  joined the Qualifications Framework Secretariat when the Government announced  its set up and operation as an independent unit in the Vocational Training  Council since 2009. 
       
For the project, she was the central co-ordination point between the EDB  and the EQF. She also coordinated with the project consultant engaged by the  EDB.  
  |